This rapid ascent of the digital age has made the debate over children and social media more imperative. Australia recently proposed banning social media for children under 13 years of age, with the intention of safeguarding young minds from the darker side of the internet. Is this the way to go? Should India take a similar step, or is there a better way to deal with the issue?
Without any question, the internet and most especially social media is turning out to be the hotbed of misinformation and propaganda. Fake news and improper images and cyberbullying are rampant in these social networking sites, making it toxic, especially for young people. Since most youngsters have yet to mature enough to manage such spaces, they tend to be easily swayed or exposed to dangerous materials. In this respect, preventing children from being victims of the negativity of social media seems to be the logical way.
The issue, however, does not end there. All these restrictions of social media towards children under 13 put the issue of liberty against personal rights into sharp perspectives. Social media is not only just a form of entertainment but an informative one and a platform for expression and communication. Limiting this may deprive a child of his or her means of communicating with their peers or exploring a digital world that is being integrated more and more with education and development. Protecting and personal freedom has to find a balance within.
This concept of banning social media also takes us to a larger issue- the potential overreach of the state. Government regulation about what children can and cannot access online could lead down a slippery slope of censorship and restrictions of free speech. It may blur the lines between the protection of the individual and the control of his or her life. In the long run, too much government intervention in the digital space raises issues of autonomy and privacy.
It is an actual answer, education and awareness rather than a blanket ban. Children and their parents should be educated about the risks and responsibilities of social media. Parents should be informed as to how to monitor children's online behavior and give them proper guidance on internet usage. Digital literacy becomes the priority so that a child can differentiate between proper information and misinformation.
Besides, the responsibility does not just rest with parents. It also calls for a more responsible approach on the part of society towards social media. With increased awareness of the threats that come with harmful content and the dangers of fake news, it is easy to create a safer digital environment. An enlightened society can bring up children better prepared to handle the challenges of the digital world.
Ultimately, the ban on social media will offer a short-term comfort, but it won't solve the problem. It has to be moved to a better-informed and educated society with an increased sense of responsibility. When this is done, we empower children and parents to face the digital world in such a way that they don't need bans anymore.
What do you think?
Should India ban social media for children under 13 or is education and awareness better? Share your thoughts in comments.
Comments